I came across Barry Deutsch's Male Privilege Checklist about a year and a half ago and got the Sagebrush men to read it. I was hoping to do something fancier with it but for some reason it kept getting pushed aside. It's simply a list (by no means exhaustive) of things men take for granted. He based it on an essay by Peggy McIntosh entitled White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack, which of course deals with many things white people take for granted because they don't have to go through the same problems as people of color.
It's not accusatory, just enlightening -- and something, IMO, Idahoans in particular need to hear more of. I've never heard more outrageous attitudes and outright misinterpretation of feminism than in Idaho, not even counting all the Limbaugh parroting about "feminazism." In fact, it's such a stifling environment when it comes to equality of any kind that some of the worst offenders are women themselves. I guess that's internalized sexism; I mean, who wants to be labeled a -- you know, I won't even write it because I don't want to perpetuate that crap or risk putting a seed into someone's head who may not be familiar with what I'm getting at.
Feminists come is many varieties and schools of philosophy, but what it all boils down to is wanting to be treated fairly and equally, in terms of respect, in terms of power, income, expectations, standards, and all the unwritten rules that dictate what is okay for a woman to be or do. This is the same for race or class, or men, for that matter, or anyone who falls into one of those "in between" areas.
So why is it so offensive to adopt a belief system that demands equality for all? That is my question.
